Photographing dead children was a common practice during Late Victorian & Early Edwardian times.

Okay. I normally don’t reblog things, and this isn’t exactly “news” related, but this is seriously one of my biggest history-related pet peeves.

It appears that only one of these children is actually dead (the baby in the lower right photo). The other two probably just had their eyes retouched, most likely because they blinked.

Obsession with Gothic Victorianism seems to make collectors and antiques dealers claim every photo with a slightly “off” looking child is a momento mori.

To determine whether a post-mortem photograph is genuine, the most important features to look for are…

  1. The color of the child’s lips, nose, ears and fingertips. In a genuine memorial photograph they will appear black or dusky due to natural post-mortem discoloration.
  2. The eyes. They will appear sunken, something which is difficult to cover up with makeup. Sometimes the eyes were closed during the photograph and were painted on later. This often leads to confusion with photos that were retouched for other reasons; i.e. a squirmy child who blinked during the flash.
  3. Is the child being supported somehow? Dead people obviously can’t support their own body weight, most noticeably their heads. Normally in genuine post-mortems a person’s head will be either held or supported by someone (usually a parent or sibling in the case of children and infants) or laid on or against something like the baby in the last photo.

Thank you for enduring my rant.


A historian currently putting together a lecture on Victorian photography, who has handled more dead bodies than most people will see in a lifetime.

P.S. No judgement on the OP here. I did reverse image searches and all the pictures were originally from vaguely official looking websites/flickrs/etc. which stated them to be genuine post-mortem photographs.

Just trying to clear up a frustratingly common historical misconception. :)

  1. hellokittyboner reblogged this from mortisia
  2. no-thr reblogged this from qveenofvagina
  3. vantablaq reblogged this from ricflairsniece
  4. buttfucktheworld reblogged this from mortisia and added:
  5. yourxxx-shitxxx-smells-xxx-bad reblogged this from mortisia
  6. itwasthecupcake reblogged this from ricflairsniece
  7. pinklippedbitch reblogged this from dorkch0ps
  8. dorkch0ps reblogged this from ricflairsniece
  9. ricflairsniece reblogged this from nutella-the-hun and added:
    That’s actually the reason they did this. It wasn’t like now where you could take hundreds of pictures with your child...
  10. itsmekaseyg reblogged this from jurikos and added:
    This reminds me of that movie The Others…fucking weird people. Whenever I go to the antique store I always go through...
  11. antownsacan reblogged this from fuckyesparanormal
  12. astrovelazquez reblogged this from jurikos
  13. jurikos reblogged this from gnarlism
  14. filthy--beauty reblogged this from fuckyesparanormal
  15. shaeshizzlex reblogged this from mortisia
  16. goaheadrunandhide reblogged this from toxicwonderlandrage
  17. notbrittany reblogged this from mortisia
  18. edwscissorhands reblogged this from mortisia
  19. panda-eyes-and-oreos reblogged this from toxicwonderlandrage
  20. toxicwonderlandrage reblogged this from mortisia
  21. sillybillyspurplewilly reblogged this from vampchick666
  22. enjoyableboredom reblogged this from hydrocephalic
  23. puhshsquared reblogged this from hydrocephalic
  24. lordofcasterlycock reblogged this from hydrocephalic
  25. hydrocephalic reblogged this from mortisia
  26. requieminfullmoon reblogged this from mortisia
  27. gottinmortem reblogged this from mortisia