Photographing dead children was a common practice during Late Victorian & Early Edwardian times.

Okay. I normally don’t reblog things, and this isn’t exactly “news” related, but this is seriously one of my biggest history-related pet peeves.

It appears that only one of these children is actually dead (the baby in the lower right photo). The other two probably just had their eyes retouched, most likely because they blinked.

Obsession with Gothic Victorianism seems to make collectors and antiques dealers claim every photo with a slightly “off” looking child is a momento mori.

To determine whether a post-mortem photograph is genuine, the most important features to look for are…

  1. The color of the child’s lips, nose, ears and fingertips. In a genuine memorial photograph they will appear black or dusky due to natural post-mortem discoloration.
  2. The eyes. They will appear sunken, something which is difficult to cover up with makeup. Sometimes the eyes were closed during the photograph and were painted on later. This often leads to confusion with photos that were retouched for other reasons; i.e. a squirmy child who blinked during the flash.
  3. Is the child being supported somehow? Dead people obviously can’t support their own body weight, most noticeably their heads. Normally in genuine post-mortems a person’s head will be either held or supported by someone (usually a parent or sibling in the case of children and infants) or laid on or against something like the baby in the last photo.

Thank you for enduring my rant.


A historian currently putting together a lecture on Victorian photography, who has handled more dead bodies than most people will see in a lifetime.

P.S. No judgement on the OP here. I did reverse image searches and all the pictures were originally from vaguely official looking websites/flickrs/etc. which stated them to be genuine post-mortem photographs.

Just trying to clear up a frustratingly common historical misconception. :)

  1. lakulutka reblogged this from satanspawnsloth
  2. satanspawnsloth reblogged this from mortisia
  3. revelioh reblogged this from asscop and added:
    what the actual fuck
  4. nnewdawnfades reblogged this from mortisia
  5. themonthofseptemblue reblogged this from ilovemyturfle
  6. whogivesthehoot reblogged this from fuckyesparanormal
  7. southern-horror reblogged this from spookymrsboo
  8. kirakamikaze reblogged this from mortisia
  9. i-came-from-baltimore reblogged this from mortisia
  10. haloroundhishead reblogged this from jonjacobsenlikes
  11. jonjacobsenlikes reblogged this from hectograph
  12. hectograph reblogged this from mortisia
  13. ezkisofrenikosinremedio reblogged this from mortisia
  14. blahmitzvah reblogged this from beyoncebeytwice
  15. scrp-bk reblogged this from mortisia
  16. who-i-really-want-to-be reblogged this from mortisia and added:
    Dead babies floating in the air
  17. the-perks-of-being-rae reblogged this from straitasanarrow
  18. straitasanarrow reblogged this from hotpornsexfuck
  19. leithreas reblogged this from selflessvanity
  20. alittlepieceofskylie reblogged this from tulipcheekymane
  21. selflessvanity reblogged this from tulipcheekymane
  22. tulipcheekymane reblogged this from zoezookeeper
  23. zoezookeeper reblogged this from hotpornsexfuck
  24. hotpornsexfuck reblogged this from hotpornsexfuck
  25. sailonsailorxo reblogged this from jacqueinabox
  26. frombeyondthemountains reblogged this from thisurlalreadyexists
  27. sierratoyourmist reblogged this from thisurlalreadyexists
  28. sheylathericeeater reblogged this from uproariouslaughter
  29. paramoreatthefalloutdisco reblogged this from thisurlalreadyexists and added:
    is that Hitler’s family or something
  30. thisurlalreadyexists reblogged this from uproariouslaughter
  31. uproariouslaughter reblogged this from slapmytitties